The ethical brain

Will increased scientific understanding of our brains overturn our beliefs about moral and ethical behavior? How will increasingly powerful brain imaging technologies affect the ideas of privacy and of self-incrimination? Such thought-provoking questions are rapidly emerging as new discoveries in neuroscience have raised difficult legal and ethical dilemmas. [In this book, the author] first examines "lifespan neuroethics" and considers how brain development defines human life, from when an embryo develops a brain and could be considered "one of us" to the issues raised as the brain ages, such as whether we should have complete freedom to extend our lives and enhance our brains through the use of genetics, pharmaceuticals, and training. [He] also considers the challenges posed to the justice system by new discoveries in neuroscience. Recent findings suggest that our brain has already made a decision before we become fully aware of doing so, raising the question of whether the concept of personal responsibility can remain a fundamental tenet of the law. Gazzaniga argues that as neuroscience learns more about the unreliability of human memory, the very foundation of trial law will be challenged. [He] then discusses a radical re-evaluation of the nature of moral belief, as he not only looks at possibly manipulating the part of the brain that creates beliefs but also explores how scientific research is building a brain-based account of moral reasoning.-http://www.loc.gov/catdir

Originally published: New York : Dana Press, ©2005.

Life-span neuroethics: Conferring moral status on an embryo; Aging brain -- Brain enhancement: Better brains through genes; Training the brain; Shaping the smart brain with drugs -- Free will, personal responsibility and the law: My brain made me do it; Antisocial thoughts and the right to privacy; Brain produces a poor autobiography -- Nature of moral beliefs and the concept of universal ethics: Believing brain; Toward a universal ethics.