"Emerging neurotechnology offers increasingly individualised brain information, enabling researchers to identify mental states and content. When accurate and valid, these brain-reading technologies also provide data that could be useful in criminal legal procedures, such as memo…
Emerging neurotechnology offers increasingly individualised brain information, enabling researchers to identify mental states and content. When accurate and valid, these brain-reading technologies also provide data that could be useful in criminal legal procedures, such as memor…
"This book examines the legal boundaries of non-consensual brain-reading in criminal justice. Focusing on human rights such as privacy and freedom of thought and expression, the book informs lawyers and ethicists debating the legal implications of emerging neurotechnology and ad…
This book examines the legal boundaries of non-consensual brain-reading in criminal justice, focusing on human rights like freedom of thought.
B. Brożek, J. Hage, Between law and the cognitive sciences. A manifesto -- J. Hage, Are the cognitive sciences relevant for law? -- C. Heidemann, Social and normative facts -- Ł. Kurek, Law, Folk psychology and cognitive science -- K. Tobia, Law and the cognitive science of ordi…
"Recent decades have brought about a genuine scientific revolution. It did not take place overnight, but the cumulative efforts of psychologists, neuroscientists, specialists in AI and philosophers have given us a picture of human cognitive processes and behaviour that is radica…
"Recent decades have brought about a genuine scientific revolution. It did not take place overnight, but the cumulative efforts of psychologists, neuroscientists, specialists in AI and philosophers have given us a picture of human cognitive processes and behaviour that is radica…
Within the criminal justice system, one of the most prominent justifications for legal punishment is retributivism. The retributive justification of legal punishment maintains that wrongdoers are morally responsible for their actions and deserve to be punished in proportion to t…
Within the criminal justice system one of the most prominent justifications for legal punishment, both historically and currently, is retributivism. The retributive justification of legal punishment maintains that, absent any excusing conditions, wrongdoers are morally responsib…
"Within the criminal justice system, one of the most prominent justifications for legal punishment is retributivism. The retributive justification of legal punishment maintains that wrongdoers are morally responsible for their actions and deserve to be punished in proportion to …
"Within the criminal justice system one of the most prominent justifications for legal punishment, both historically and currently, is retributivism. The retributive justification of legal punishment maintains that, absent any excusing conditions, wrongdoers are morally responsi…
"Within the criminal justice system one of the most prominent justifications for legal punishment, both historically and currently, is retributivism. The retributive justification of legal punishment maintains that, absent any excusing conditions, wrongdoers are morally responsi…