Across the country, in courts, classrooms, and the media, Americans are deeply divided over the use of race in admitting students to universities. Yet until now the debate over race and admissions has consisted mainly of clashing opinions, uninformed by hard evidence. This work,…
Across the country, in courts, classrooms, and the media, Americans are deeply divided over the use of race in admitting students to universities. Yet until now the debate over race and admissions has consisted mainly of clashing opinions, uninformed by hard evidence. This work,…
Two legal experts make the explosive argument that affirmative action hurts minority students' educational and career chances - and that liberals are in denial about it.
This book demonstrates in detail how racial admissions preferences often undermine the success of the people they are intended to help. As. if that were not bad enough, the pervasive secrecy that veils the operation and effects of racial preferences even from most academics has …
Two legal experts make the explosive argument that affirmative action hurts minority students' educational and career chances - and that liberals are in denial about it.
Argues that affirmative action actually harms minority students and that the movement started in the late 1960s is only a symbolic change that has become mired in posturing, concealment, and pork-barrel earmarks.
"Grounded in Critical Race Theory (CRT), Black Men in Law School refutes the claim that when African American law students are "mismatched" with more selective law schools, the result is lower levels of achievement and success. Presenting personal narratives and counter-stories,…
