The rule of law paradigm has long operated on the premise that independent judges disregard extralegal influences and impartially uphold the law. A political transformation several generations in the making, however, has imperiled this premise. Social science learning, the lesso…
In this study - the fruit of a lifelong critical and imaginative engagement with W H. Auden's works - Anthony Hecht identifies and traces consistent habits of thought and belief within the poet's extensive and varied writings and through his celebrated conversions and repudiatio…
Drawing on over 100 interviews, including a total of 36 law lords, this book provides a compelling view into the workings of the House of Lords court during its final decade and into the formative years of the Supreme Court.
Drawing on over 100 interviews, including a total of 36 law lords, this book provides a compelling view into the workings of the House of Lords court during its final decade and into the formative years of the Supreme Court.
Drawing on over 100 interviews, including a total of 36 Law Lords, this book provides a compelling and unrivalled view into the workings of the Court during its final decade, and into the formative years of the Supreme Court.
Drawing on over 100 interviews, including a total of 36 law lords, this book provides a compelling view into the workings of the House of Lords court during its final decade and into the formative years of the Supreme Court.
La 4e de couverture indique : "Daniel Paul Schreber (1842-1911) was a senior German judge and jurist. He formulated a unique juridical theology of private life and developed a critical account of oikonomia, the practice of governance and administration. But his theoretical work …
Peter Goodrich looks beyond Judge Schreber's mental health to evaluate his jurisprudential theory. Goodrich analyses Schreber's Memoirs, interpreters and intellectual context to show how Schreber challenges the legal thought of his era and opens up a potentially vital approach t…
The first scholarly comparative analysis of Jacques Derrida and Gilles Deleuze's philosophies of difference.
