This book focuses on the future of the global population and proposes revising Malthus Law. The United Nations estimates that the global population will top 11 billion by 2100, at which point its growth will be near an end: it will find a new equilibrium in a long demographic tr…
La population mondiale devrait dépasser les neuf milliards d'individus en 2050, soit trois fois plus qu'en 1950, et certains voient dans cet accroissement démographique l'une des causes principales de la destruction environnementale. Mais y a-t-il véritablement trop de monde sur…
La population mondiale devrait dépasser les neuf milliards d'individus en 2050, soit trois fois plus qu'en 1950, et certains voient dans cet accroissement démographique l'une des causes principales de la destruction environnementale. Mais y a-t-il véritablement trop de monde sur…
La population mondiale devrait dépasser les neuf milliards d'individus en 2050, soit trois fois plus qu'en 1950, et certains voient dans cet accroissement démographique l'une des causes principales de la destruction environnementale. Mais y a-t-il véritablement trop de monde sur…
"Sarah Conly argues that we do not have the right to have more than one child. If recent increases in global population continue, we will reduce the welfare of future generations to unacceptable levels. We do no't have a right to impose on others in this way. While voluntary eff…
The problem -- The right to a family -- The right to control your body -- Sanctions -- The future -- Unexpected consequences -- When?
Sarah Conly argues that at present we do not have the right to have more than one child. We do not need to have more than one to live a good life, and having more than one when we are at risk of depleting our environmental resources is simply too dangerous to others.
"Sarah Conly argues that we do not have the right to have more than one child. If recent increases in global population continue, we will reduce the welfare of future generations to unacceptable levels. We do no't have a right to impose on others in this way. While voluntary eff…
"Sarah Conly argues that we do not have the right to have more than one child. If recent increases in global population continue, we will reduce the welfare of future generations to unacceptable levels. We do no't have a right to impose on others in this way. While voluntary eff…
"A VINTAGE PAPERBACK ORIGINAL Deforestation. Desertification. Species extinction. Global warming. Growing threats to food and water. These driving issues of our times are the result of one huge problem: Us. Just over two hundred years ago, there were one billion humans on Earth.…