"In a clear and elegant style, T.M. Scanlon reframes current philosophical debates as he explores the moral permissibility of an action. Permissibility may seem to depend on the agent's reasons for performing an action. There seems to be an important moral difference, for exampl…
Frequently, alleged irreconcilable conflicts between science and religion are instead misdescribed battles concerning negotiable philosophical assumptions - conflicts between metaphysics and metaphysics. Hud Hudson provides a two-stage illustration of this claim with respect to …
Olick looks at how catastrophic, terrible pasts, Nazi Germany, apartheid South Africa, are remembered, but he is particularly concerned with the role that memory plays in social structures. Memory can foster any number of things, social solidarity, nostalgia, civil war, but it a…
In Moral Judgment, Professor Wilson demonstrates how our judicial system has compromised its obligation to discriminate between right and wrong. He explains why lawyers and judges - by distinguishing between personal and judicial responsibility, by inviting the participation of …