An examination of twenty-one countries' experiences of domestic judicial review being used to challenge trade remedy determinations.
"Trade remedies, namely anti-dumping, countervailing measures and safeguards, are one of the most controversial issues in today's global trading environment. When used, such measures effectively close the markets of the importing countries to competition from outside for a certa…
An examination of twenty-one countries' experiences of domestic judicial review being used to challenge trade remedy determinations.
La 4e de couverture indique : "This volume provides the first English translation of Hans Kelsen's and Carl Schmitt's influential Weimar-era debate on constitutional guardianship and the legitimacy of constitutional review. It includes Kelsen's seminal piece, 'The Nature and Dev…
La question prioritaire de constitutionnalité
by Bonnet, Julien, Gahdoun, Pierre-Yves
fromCairn
La loi protège les libertés, garantit un espace de sécurité. Mais qu'arrive-t-il lorsque la loi est tyrannique, injuste, illégitime ? Contre ces possibles dérives, de nombreux États ont adopté des mécanismes juridiques permettant une surveillance des agissements du Parlement. En…
This book offers an empirical analysis of how academic peer review panels mediate the traditionally non-academic criterion of societal impact. The UK's 2014 Research Excellence Framework (REF2014) for the first time included an "Impact" criterion that considered how research had…
This work addresses the age-old tension between law and politics by examining whether the personal beliefs of judges come into play in adjudicating on issues of religious freedom, sex discrimination, and social and economic rights.
"The Ultimate Rule of Law addresses the age-old tension between law and politics by examining whether the personal beliefs of judges come into play in adjudicating on issues of religious freedom, sex discrimination, and social and economic rights. Decisions by the Supreme Courts…
This work addresses the age-old tension between law and politics by examining whether the personal beliefs of judges come into play in adjudicating on issues of religious freedom, sex discrimination, and social and economic rights.